Fandango — Judicious

Fandango is a blogger who is providing one-word writing prompts, as quite sometime ago WordPress ended its daily word prompts, which for a long time were single words. Today, Fandango’s Challenge word is “judicious.”

https://fivedotoh.com/2019/09/06/fowc-with-fandango-judicious/

It may not be judicious to take something like a blog and publish without a mission statement, but neither me, nor my father, who between us coordinate our efforts to help direct the care of a small local cemetery, but I don’t believe too much trouble can result if I avoid coarse language, if I avoid contentious ideas like drug use information, about which you probably know there is a surplus, or any kind of criminal endeavor, particularly as I don’t do much that’s illegal, or anything that refers to unhealthy Internet stereotypes like revenge porn, say, or Incels, involuntary celibates. Things of that nature are most likely going to inflame ill will if they persist.

A mission statement is something many organizations or business have that represents a set of principles that govern their members’ actions. They are “ethical” guidelines.

www.maplelawncemetery.org

Generally, a mission statement needs to be big enough in scope that individual behaviors aren’t examined under a microscope, nor are they “black and white.” The work my dad and I do, along with occasional help from family friends, is volunteer-style work that most people wouldn’t concern themselves with. Disruptive ideas aren’t necessary–there is a fine line between being interesting to other bloggers and being “ridiculous,” a word I am loathe to say, but which my mother and father occasionally speak about as though it isn’t offensive.

Dimensions: 2989 x 4513
Photographer: Ryan Riggins

I appreciate Fandango’s blog for the word prompts that take up the slack where the WordPress daily prompts concluded, and while I suspect Fandango is on Pacific time, not Eastern like myself, good timing is important and Fandango encourages his participants to take an interest in other responses . I don’t mind addressing Fandango’s word prompts occasionally if the definition of the challenge word is something I can address in a short post. The blog Fandango publishes takes a number of different avenues and just of late now I have found some of his insight applicable to what I can do myself. Cheers!

Advertisements

15 Ways the Most Youthful Adherent to Video Research is Totally Overrated. Part II

I’d been focusing when I could on five more ways you can dispense with some of the time you’re putting into video research.  If you do anything like that and if you think of consuming video content as being video research, then increasingly I don’t think there’s a consensus that anything like video research is useful.
I’m looking back in time when there were different attitudes to video.  I mean that it wasn’t as accessible as it today.  It occurs to me I should argue that if you are committed to any research activity utilizing video, and there’s a ready workaround, you should concentrate on the workaround.

Published on Nov 21, 2018
Free speech in Canada died today https://bit.ly/2BEP6cW

Photographer:
Rawpixel.com
Aerial view of black board with the letter forming hello greeting concept
  1. The first part for this post, about chasing an adherent to research, left off with points how you can turn some of your conclusions into blog posts.  Or if you don’t have a blog, there’s somewhere you could start.  I would like to make the point that the best conclusions you can form from watching a lot of videos can indeed be put somewhere, like in a blog, or a podcast, etc.  For example, on Patrick Bet-David’s Valutainment on the internet, I watched Bet-David and Robert Greene discuss Greene’s latest bestseller.
    Bet-David pointed out that Greene sat down with three hundred books to write his latest book, for the pay-off.  That’s the traditional sense of research that I don’t think you should disregard in any way.  There is no way that you can eliminate the process of reading the page, or perhaps your Kindle, from the actual work of doing research.  Sad but true.
  2. The traditional sense of video is taking a video camera to a wedding and then selling it to the wedding party.  The best research you can cultivate from a video of that kind is whether a particular family member was in attendance, or perhaps how the bridesmaids looked when they were standing side by side.
    Do you see many wedding videos, apart from celebrity weddings, that make it onto the Internet?  I am not sure there are, particularly as the advent of the handheld video camera has given way to the smartphone camera.
    If you are a young person reading this, and you don’t relate to the idea of a videographer at a wedding, it isn’t that different from a professional photographer taking pictures.  It is just that the videographer mingles with the wedding party and gets a little movie of the wedding.
  3. I’m writing there about commercial consumer video, not expensive TV productions.  The thing about the video you watch is that when it is a pricey production, I don’t think you can count on it for insight.  Particularly when focusing on video production for TV, in the nineteen sixties, seventies, and eighties, when the technology was useful enough to shoot material for television, and before computers were beginning to infiltrate it, there just wasn’t a lot of purely informative video.  The novelty on being on video overshadowed a requirement, to be honest.  As soon as the camera was recording, everybody was immediately acting at all times.
    That sounds like a polarized argument, but ninety-nine percent of the time if you were being paid to appear on camera, you were acting to do it.  Speaking jovially, you had to nail it.
  4. What happened in the mid-nineteen-eighties?  Computer effects were beginning to be integrated into more and more of the ready video, which starts to become interesting for the possibility that more and better information could be communicated by video.  With more information is born the reality that better information begins to come across.  Purists might disagree, but fast-forward fifteen years and amateur video is not only more accessible but could also be edited on par with the best of people in the trade in previous decades.
    There had been an explosion of video on cable TV which meant more ways to deliver information by video.  Did that mean you could derive better conclusions in the sense that by better I mean better located in reality?  I think so.
    You always want the past back, once you’re past a certain age, but there is some logic, or I am doing my best to apply logic here.
  5. The apparent irony is that the development of the computer industry accelerated at a much faster pace than did the growth of video.  I’m tempted once more to stop, but it’s true that by the time video was in its golden years, the computer industry was spritely, pardon the pun, spritely and skyrocketing for many, many people.  I don’t want to mislead you unfairly, but surely some blame for some of the big, really bad troubles that have hit people where there is free access to information lies with what’s just bad information.
    That caution gets sounded frequently, and where before I was tempted to stop then and there, now I really am going to stop.

I have promised one more post on the subject, with five remaining ways you might want to dodge video.  You’re welcome to like, comment, and/or follow.


Photographer:
Sticker Mule

I am humbled by the attention I receive and I shall make some effort to reciprocate interest if I am lucky enough to make a tiny ripple in this pond.
We need to go back to the future

supermarket
November 26, 2018