Crackle Show Startup Got Me Real Interested in its First Season

The Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment video title Startup was added to Netflix in May, and it’s effectively perhaps the most mainstream at present. Pop viewership in March 2021 arrived at its most elevated since the set up of April 2020.

Startup is an American drama series that premiered on September 6, 2016, on Crackle, a streaming platform. Startup introduces viewers to a young Stanford graduate with a program code she’s composed that will change the universe of money.

Photo by Vidsplay on StockSnap

So, another digital currency is on the cusp of coming. The real Bitcoin, I think, was the invention of a programmer so reclusive and mysterious that, while he is spoken of as a legend, had, lucky for him, none of the Startup girl’s problems. Bitcoin’s mysterious maker might be valued at $6 billion — however, individuals actually don’t have a clue what its identity is.

In Startup GenCoin, computerized money, is the fundamental topic of a techno-thrill ride. Startup’s girl finds a money guy in the form of a banker who sees the potential in her concept, and, without being morally bankrupt like his father, who has laundered, and lost, the funds, this bright handsome banker now has a big investment on the table.

Like father, like son, and he leaves his job, incurring tension between him and his girlfriend, to help make the success of the new startup a reality. Unfortunately, all that money is again stolen.

GenCoin is the company the trio has created for themselves, the programmer, the banker, and a street tough. See, 300,000 dollars has the impossible outcome that the man of his word needs to turn into an accomplice, since, we discover, he doesn’t care for the hidden world of the show’s city, Miami, and needs to remove his family from there. The broker meets some unacceptable financial backer, a software engineer who’s actually a rich mean goof, who takes their organization, and soon their whole business, too.

Are they forgiven? 300,000 reasons say they aren’t.

Season 1 is eight episodes long, and while I’m spoiling it here, I enjoyed the optimism I felt watching the three main characters make a reality out of a dream by dint of their ingenuity, and you will probably will as well if you haven’t got into the show already. Netflix describes Startup as a slow-burn, and, truth be told, the positive outcomes that occur in the early scenes of Season 1 are before long superseded by various outrageous difficulties, which, all things considered, would have left the ambushed novices speechless, had any of these occasions occurred without the wide range of a powerful influence for GenCoin.

That they resolve to roll with the punches gives Startup significant interest because the trio keeps making solutions to big, dangerous problems. Season 1 of the show is written in a way that feels mostly believable and also satisfying if you identify with, or are sympathetic to, any of the three young entrepreneurs central to the show.

Photo by YesManPro on StockSnap

I thought Crackle had a strong first season with Startup. While I am watching the second season now, I wonder if it will adhere to a similar outcome, after the conclusion that Season 1 managed, the somewhat hasty cliffhanger that was for me a shade confusing.

Head for San Juan, Puerto Rico… If Crackle hadn’t permitted a renewal, the end of Startup’s first season might have proved frustrating. Likely, the creative team on the show had a pretty clear idea that a hit as big as they had on their hands would return, but I don’t know how anything like that can be taken for granted when there are talented actors at work who have to believe, I think, that they have been part of something good.

Another Netflix title, called The Last Blockbuster, gives soundbites about Blockbuster video rentals lost, now, to Netflix. The Last Blockbuster is about Blockbuster LLC’s last store, in Bend, Oregon.

I guess I might not even be qualified to work at a Blockbuster store, if there was such a thing anymore, because I have questions that an entertainer, inferable from his gifts and great looks, landed an extraordinary role in Startup. Sure, I imagine he gave a perfect audition, marked by a combination of qualities, picky sincerity, intelligence for money, and people skills that keep the character endeared to his business partners.

Google gives me the name of this actor, Adam Brody.

Adam Brody

‘Startup‘ on Netflix Cast Guide’s: Adam Brody

Adam Brody stars as Nick Talman, an ethically tangled financier who uses messy cash to foster a tech organization

https://decider.com/2021/05/11/startup-cast-on-netflix/#/

Many times when a problem solver with a silver tongue is necessary, compared to computer programming acumen, or street threats, the leadership falls to Brody.

If Season 1 existed as only a limited series, it would be satisfactory in itself, I think, if some expository explanation of what happened after the events, maybe appearing in a few paragraphs of text, to finish the story. To indicate that the startup succeeded and that the trio of players became rich and notorious (in the circle of Big Tech) would have been fine with me. Instead (pretty big spoiler), Season 1 ends with an abrupt cliffhanger.

Photo by Matt Moloney on StockSnap

In real life, from time to time I wonder how Gen-Z will do since the world economy is the way that it is. I thinking about how the diversion of the different public economies will be sufficiently large to give roles to, for example, entertainers who can make it in theatre and film and TV.

While not in the cast of Startup, actor Mads Mikkelsen, who in 2006 played Russian spy Le Chiffre in the blockbuster film Casino Royale, said of late during a Casino Royale reunion between Mikkelsen and Daniel Craig that there surely is a ton of contest, which most everyone knows. Good luck making even steps to community theatre.

That is to say, my nephew has made conditional advances as an entertainer, and what I have seen of him on record, I delighted in, and will wish him well should he choose to keep developing as an entertainer. He’s been a brilliant student. I remember my little sister handing me a nice DVD edition of Casino Royale back in the day, a gift for some occasion.

We were in my parents’ car, though not, of course, an Aston Martin.

Casino Royale Car Chase https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ry8ddLxkGJE

I read the novel when I was a boy. The outcome of that chase is similar to what Bond endures in the novel Casino Royale by the late Ian Fleming.

Mads Mikkelsen plays the vile Kaecilius, on the opposite side of the real world, says Marvel president Kevin Feige: “People Think In Terms Of Good And Evil When Really Time Is The True Enemy Of Us All.”

Daniel Craig, the actor who played James Bond the last fifteen years (i.e. the M.I.6 spy), tried to wave off Mikkelsen’s comment during their reunion, knowing, probably, the importance that great actors are going to continue to be a major part of our world culture. It’s important this goes on. Money and the promise of success are great motivators, but so is quality.

I’m a loner, yet would seldom appreciate watching another TV show. I like Riverdale, though. I am looking forward to the twelfth of August when Riverdale returns.

It was actually a friend’s feedback that encouraged me to accept that the Netflix trailer for Startup might actually be pointing to some pretty decent entertainment. If you didn’t watch Startup in May, you could do worse than to permit yourself time to enjoy it. Many notes it hits are electrifying.

I didn’t think it works that way. Does it work that way? It doesn’t work that way. Could it?

Today has been National Ice Cream Day. Enjoy!

Thanks for visiting. You can like and comment and follow.

https://about.me/patrickcoholan

How a #spring ruling on Content Curations made me a better person

My younger sister wrote me this spring that she had read Dale Carnegie’s “How to Win Friends and Influence People.”  She said the book improved her interpersonal interactions at work.

One morning I started my content curation tools on the internet, and to my surprise, the designers I tool I use most often had revamped the app.

I work in a mostly volunteer capacity at a cemetery.  http://www.maplelawncemetery.org

What the app does is to find webpages for the purpose of putting content on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. Looking at it after its overhaul, I saw I needed to think of keywords for content that were both honest about what I am interested in doing, and valuable to people looking at me on Facebook, and on Twitter.  The reality of whether the more fringe areas of my research were or weren’t going to fly in the face of other people squarely confronted me.

I don’t want to inadvertently confuse people.

Some of my ideas just weren’t going to work, I saw. Our Facebook page is small, but those people aren’t going to be swayed, I now believe, by where I had been putting my nose if I am being transparent.

https://www.facebook.com/LouthUnited

There is an idea in business that employees don’t work for the boss, that in fact, the boss works for the employees.  I work for the people who like the page.  I don’t have the freedom to indulge every avenue I want to, if I don’t want to turn off the people I speak to, and it is probably true that new people I might possibly interest will have similar sensibilities to those who are already involved.

Boss-Employee Relationship Etiquette https://www.thespruce.com/boss-employee-relationship-etiquette-4117468

I hadn’t been aware the more fringe elements of my keyword research was a potential problem, and, without my input, a solution presented itself.

I had envisioned that I would find a strategy to make this work when the time came.  With fresh eyes, I began to see how to better use my content tools going forward.  In the process, I became, in a small way, a more honest person, at least more honest about what I am doing on social.

As the Buddhist maxim asserts: “Never lie, cheat, or steal.”  I got a little more spiritual, yesterday, you might say. It was unexpected all the same.

Maple Lawn Cemetery

On Twitter, I’m https://twitter.com/findingenvirons  

DrumUp is an app on the world wide web at https://drumup.io  

The DrumUp starter plan is inexpensive, and it offers a lot of use for someone with a business model on Facebook, Twitter, and/or LinkedIn.

10 Reasons Radical Success is the Weakest Link Part II

The White Album puzzle

Updated November 9, 2018

December 2017 my brother and his wife and kids gave me an unusual gift for Christmas, a puzzle game celebrating The Beatles’ music The White AlbumIt is unusual mainly for the fact that the cover of The White Album is entirely the color white, which makes the puzzle an exercise in assembling puzzle pieces all the color white.  It is as if the wrong end of a game of chess game came down on you.

September 24, 2018, the Stereogum music history website posted to Facebook about the fiftieth-anniversary release of The White Album.  The Beatles Announce 50th Anniversary “White Album” Reissue With Previously Unreleased Tracks

The White Album puzzle
The Beatles

I think of The Beatles being a radical success in music history, given the enormity of their popularity, even decades later.  However, how does that view of The Beatles relate to contemporary ideas about success, and how it is won?

I have ten reasons I’m suggesting that success like what The Beatles enjoyed is actually a weak link in terms of what it means for the individual to pursue preconceived notions of success and how it is misleading.  The first four were presented in a previous blog post.  The remaining six are presented here.

Streaming services

  1. Netflix is the leader of the pack, I believer, for video streaming.  They devote an enormous budget to original content and their selection of existing content is good.
    That being said, Disney is entering the streaming video service market soon, as is AT&T, I understand.  Netflix in my region is compatible with my TiVo, as is another video streaming service, the free video streaming site Tubi.  The selection on Tubi is big, but they don’t offer original video.
    Both Netflix and Tubi are compatible with my TiVo, but the selection of videos on Netflix is good and for Tubi, not so much.  I want to step out of the chain of logic to ask if that implies that Tubi is a weak link.  Netflix is a completely enjoyable experience if you watch video and Tubi is an extra addition to the TiVo I watch TV with.
    It isn’t too hard to say which could be better assessed to be a radical success in the future.  That being said, while Netflix needs to make a lot of important decisions before the day is done to remain ahead of the curve, Tubi is probably under far less pressure.
    Does Tubi’s relative weak link status mean that it isn’t a success?  It is free.

    Dimensions: 3811 x 3337
    Photographer: Rawpixel.com
  2. Going forward with the theory that radical success means enormous difficulty, consider the contender that could grab much of Netflix’ market share, Disney.  Disney is certain, given its weight as an entertainment brand, to include great films and shows, being known for its films, television, toys and theme parks.

Which of the two, Netflix or Disney, will be more of the radical success–that a good streaming service can be?  Or will they both amount to great success?  Disney has built in family-appeal given its products for both adults and kids alike; Netflix has been building that kind of appeal from scratch.  Will either Netflix or Disney be a weak link?  It seems important to me that entertainment be good when it is accessed or experienced.

It would be a shame, I think, for the bottom to fall out of Netflix if it were to become a weak link given competition.  Netflix has a reputation for spending extravagant amounts of money on shows and films while not necessarily having a concrete plan in place to recoup its expenditures.  As I said, Disney already has an enormous built-in capacity for success in the future, in addition to plans for its new streaming service

I would ask if streaming video is right for Disney, given all they’ve done to pack movie houses with so many great family films.  Will Netflix Ever Actually Make Any Money?

Dimensions: 3648 x 5472
Photographer: Jakob Owens

3. I started this post by saying there is a fiftieth-anniversary release of The White Album coming 11/9.  From what I understand about music streaming services, Spotify has a great conversion rate bringing customers from free use of Spotify to the premium version.  I would ask if taken to task whether Spotify will be a “weak link.”

From what I can tell, the selection of music with Spotify is wonderful.  I’ve never actually searched for The Beatles, but I am sure they are there.  The selection is good.  I have fewer specifics on hand, but I wouldn’t appreciate seeing Spotify become relegated to “weak link” status, as it seems to be an awesome service.

It is understood that The Beatles essentially recorded The White Album live to 8-track tape, and for everything they’d done in the name of their music they were in fact recording music that would be a bit of a farewell to their fans.  If less scrutiny was being given to the music emerging on The White Album, would The Beatles have lasted longer and recorded songs for longer than they did?  I think it is possible, for when something is intended to be “perfect,” it is often a departure the way a pinnacle climbed must then be descended.

US Politics 

4. If you are following this argument, you can guess that the weak link I’m referring to is the President of the United States.  I don’t like to posit criticism of the United States or its politics, but an example of someone about who there is much to decry that could be a weak link is the President.

As he is someone who was a TV star, I think it is worth mentioning here the radical success that he is known for enjoying and how at the same time the President has mounting problems that he is both a radical success, being wealthy and commanding power, but also a “weak link” in that he could bring down the whole show if he is not effective.  President Trump has a knack for appearing with ferocious emphasis again and again in the news, and yet he faces so much criticism and real-life repercussions and consequences that I think he makes a great example of a “weak link” who is at the same time a radical success.

The President brings to mind so many components and elements of radical success gone wrong that it is becoming clearer all the time that the President of the United States is an extremely divisive man. Donald Trump Says China Remix

 

Dimensions: 3556 x 2371
Photographer: Diego Jimenez

Motivated to Entrepreneurship

5. The ninth reason I want to assert that a weak link can be very much undermining is the idea that if you begin to succeed as an entrepreneur you can find yourself under more pressure than you ever anticipated facing.  Making money is many people’s idea of success, but you have to put in years of work to make dreams come true.  And in this scenario, ironically, you yourself could be the weakest link if you don’t meet obstacles well.


Unless you keep improving, day in and day out, you could end up being the weak link in your organization simply owing to the fact that your luck could change.  If you have found a strategy that makes you King Midas, turning everything you touch to gold, if all of a sudden your luck changes, you may now be suddenly in a seat of weakness.  The Secret to Self-Motivation | Gary Vaynerchuk’s GREATEST Motivational Speech Ever! 

Photographer: Rawpixel.com
Aerial view of computer laptop on wooden table

You need to keep improving and being good.  Everything that took you somewhere is behind you; you have to continue to make great decisions.  I suspect you’ll see for yourself if you falter.

6. The final reason I want to take back to Geeks + Gamers.  If you have someone, like Jeremy, who has more than one channel on YouTube, who is comfortable discussing games, films, and sports, a very articulate individual, who sees success coming from YouTube, from a Facebook group, from Twitch I suppose, who challenges who is at the top, as with The Last Jedi remaining a highly successful film, however vocal its detractors, I think it is a philosophical note to say that if you are at that pinnacle I referenced above, there is any number of reasons your descent will be hastened by those who come after you.  You have to reach that pinnacle in excellent form; and you have to leave it in such a way that it endures, that there could be a fifty-anniversary, that there could be another billion-dollar blockbuster, that there could be a second term.  This is all vital, from a philosophical standpoint, what must be done if radical success, like the kind that spreads all around the globe, is to be achieved and then preserved. CLICKBAIT : A YOUTUBE STORY

I was amused by the Christmas gift last year of The White Album puzzle game I got from my brother and his family.  If you have read this, please feel free to “like,” “follow,” and/or comment.

How Is It We Came Across This?

Today’s WordPress Daily Prompt is the word awkward. Here are a few words to the effect that being caught awkward is a compelling reason to rush a catch-up.

What catches me most off guard, most frequently, is the “brain fog” I get from being overwhelmed with too many new facts and figures. It is always a hard measure to make that new information could require a say so, or if it is better to sit back and let the storm take it course.

Dimensions: 4813 x 3213
Photographer: Nao Triponez

That’s the essence of demonstrating research skills–judgments about the usefulness of info that is easy to slip up on when nothing but smooth sailing was expected. It can resemble trial by fire.

The most significant decision is whether the new info is only a time waster, or if it does benefit you to react. Coming up with an appropriate reaction is the hardest decision to make in the whole process. It’s awkward because sometimes there is a sense of damage having been done.

When new facts are discomfiting, while I surely believe that a lot of people get angry in the face of trouble, I don’t find matters to be very easily resolved by simply getting mad and responding with contempt. It is necessary to see a positive in every negative scenario.

I belong to a not-for-profit operated by family and in the course the work I do occasionally experience unexpected problems which demand physical, real-world responses. The trouble of the “data science” variety feels a bit slimy in that you don’t know if the impact of what’s become apparent is going to have a measurable impact on your efforts. I am trying to candidly address the problem of being found awkward in the professional sense and to give a few thoughts on handling it.

Those are the most stressful times I encounter. Prompt is the word awkward.

Being Artificial on Social Media

I saw a headline on the Internet today that members of the age group Generation Z never knew days of social when it wasn’t a combination of various influencer groups.

Forging a representation of yourself for the Internet is rampantly common and has been for a long time.  When you post to Facebook, or to Twitter, or to YouTube, or to any other platform, you have an opportunity to render artificial something that is real in your life.

 This is kind of an evaluation of your everyday life experience, and in the process of translating it for the Internet, it is like aiming a throw against the palisade of the other.

Dimensions: 5821 x 3870
Photographer: Bartłomiej Jacak

When thinking of creative methods by which you translate your life onto social media, you have an ability and a freedom to craft content that is representative of you, while being artificial in format.  Your life is real, as real as you experience it, and with social, you are tapping into a real-world experience for the purpose of consumption by the other.

 

There is nothing completely real about posting on social, yet it is viewed as an offshoot of real life because you are inherently human.  Therefore the urge to render your life on social has the weight that you’re growing content out of the experience you have offline.  It wouldn’t be artificial if it were really happening.

 

AI will not justifiably imitate this process.

The urge to render your life on social media means that you grow your content out of experiences you have in real life.  You are translating your experience offline into content that the other can digest and reflect upon, to view how you are instead of he or she, between human beings.  There is no algorithm that can match this ability.

 

Social media forms content grown from life, but rendered artificial inasmuch as it is only one representation of what has happened to you in your life, the impetus of real life.

Feel free to like this post or to comment, and/or to follow if you found this post thoughtful.  I hope for you that your own social goes well and that the best moments in your life are conferred as though they were vitally important, which they are.

You are an individual and you have an opportunity to celebrate the best of what happens to you.